Justice Department Statistics About Black On White Race Violence


'The Race War Of Black Against White' by Paul Sheehan
The Sydney Morning Herald , Australia, 20 May 1995

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It determined the result of last year's congressional election.

Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War, which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start suggesting, immediately.

No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent retribution against white America.

And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years, violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than young whites.

Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not been reported in America:

 

 

 

 

These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960's, when there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of the modern civil rights movement.

Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed, overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparisons 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean war.

When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were ommitted in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2 per cent in the reverse).

When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of American life and American ideals since World War II.

All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its coverage of black America, a lower standard.




Adult black males only make up 1.2 % of the population (ages 16 - 45), yet commit 74% of all severe violent crime.


"Blacks are as much more likely to be arrested for violent crimes as men are more likely to be arrested than women. To the extent that arrest rates are a good indication of actual criminal behavior - and there is very strong evidence that they are - blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women. If people feel more threatened by unknown men than by unknown women and are justified in taking  additional precautions against them, from a statistical point of view, they are equally
justified in making the same distinctions between blacks and whites." (New Century
Foundation, "The Color of Crime," 1998, p.1)

Wanna check for yourself? http://www.amren.com/color.pdf

While the Census Bureau often categorizes real Whites separately from
mestizos, the FBI and the Justice Department usually do not. The law-enforcement agencies of the federal government lump together crimes committed by Whites, mestizos, Arabs, Jews, various North Africans and Middle Easterners, and certain Filipinos into the same category, deceptively labeled "Whites," skewing the apparent White crime total upwards. When the FBI reports a percentage of crimes as having "White" perpetrators, we must keep in mind that the report refers to the combination of Whites and these others, who together formed about 84% of the US population in 1995. To prevent confusion between real Whites and all those whom the FBI calls "Whites," we will put the category of FBI "Whites" in quotation marks.

The FBI Uniform Crime Reports are available on the Internet at
www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm  In one of these reports, titled Crime in the United States, 1995, we can draw several interesting conclusions from Table 2.8. In 1995, there were 10032 US murders having a single perpetrator and a single victim.
Of these murders, Blacks committed 5175 (51.6%) and "Whites" committed
4476 (44.6%). The Black per capita murder perpetration rate was over seven times higher than the "White" rate. There were at least 1303 interracial murders (13.0% of total murders), of which 753 were committed by Blacks (57.8% of interracial murders) and 352 were committed by "Whites" (27.0%). The Black per capita interracial murder perpetration rate was about fourteen times higher than that for "Whites." There were
699 murders in which Blacks killed "Whites" (53.6% of interracial murders) and 281 murders in which "Whites" killed Blacks (21.6%). The average Black was 16.4 times more likely to kill a "White" than the reverse. How does that square with what you heard in television news reports during the same period? And what does that tell you about the media?

A well-known, but little examined, publication is Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996, which is available on the Internet at
http://www.census.gov/prod/2/gen/96statab/96statab.html or can be purchased at a bookstore under the title The American Almanac 1995-1996. Several tables of data in
this publication contain racial information that is generally unknown by the American public, though usually data from two or more tables must be brought together in order
for the racial significance to become clear. For example, when the racially resolved populations of major US cities are taken from Table 46 and correlated with the per capita murder rates of the same cities taken from Table 311, it becomes clear that cities that, in 1995, were nearly all-White had relatively very few murders (e.g., Mesa, Anchorage, St. Paul, Colorado Springs) and that the per capita murder rate rises with increasing
percentages of non-Whites (Miami, Los Angeles, Newark), especially Blacks (Detroit, Atlanta, Baltimore, St. Louis, Birmingham, New Orleans). It is interesting that the government publication had no special table to permit someone to more easily appreciate that fact.

Table 2.6 in Crime in the United States, 1995, contains murder rates that are broken down by both race and age. When this information is correlated with the racially resolved US population data in Table 24 of Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996, we can
determine that Blacks in any age group are more likely to commit murder than "Whites" of the same age. In fact, there is no age group for which the Black per capita murder perpetration rate is low enough to be "merely" triple the "White" rate. If you feel up to doing interpolations and more UCR file downloading, you can determine that the fact expressed by the previous sentence holds true for 1996, 1997 and 1998 (latest available
figures), as well as for 1995.

Liberals often try to blame Black violence on poverty. The Census data, however, disproves that hypothesis. How? In 1995, among the American poor, there were 16.3
million Whites (real ones), 10.0 million Blacks, 8.6 million "Hispanics," and 1.4 million Asians.
Blacks comprised about 27.6% of the American poor. Those poverty numbers can be verified at http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/pov95/povest1.html.

 During that year, Blacks committed about 54% of all US murders. Remember that the FBI, from whom the murder information comes, counts "Hispanics" as "Whites," making the total number of poor persons eligible to be committing murders as "Whites" about 24.8 million. These "Whites" comprised 68.5% of the American poor, but committed -
at most - only 46% of 1995 US murders, if we make the doubtful assumption that Asians and Amerindians committed none. The evidence argues against the liberal hypothesis that poverty causes crime.

Indeed, the US Department of Justice states baldly, "Racial differences exist…" at
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm. The BJS recently also began to publicize the fact that Blacks are 7 times more likely than Whites to "commit homicide," in addition to their earlier statement that Blacks are 6 times more likely to "be murdered" than Whites. Even allowing for the slight language bias with respect to the use of the words "homicide" and "murder,"* that is a remarkable departure from "political correctness" for a federal government agency to permit itself.

*Not every homicide is a murder, however the Bureau of Justice Statistics would have no official interest in justifiable homicides, as these are not crimes, and it would have limited interest in accidental homicides, as these are often not crimes, though they may be the
occasion for action by civil courts.


Sometimes, after liberals see their "poverty causes crime" hypothesis go down in flames, they shift over to a kind of "class envy" argument. Suddenly, it isn't primal necessity
that drives all those poor Blacks tocrime - it's envy instead, for which of course the Black murderers should not be blamed. In the rural areas, the liberals say, people are spread out and rich and poor don't necessarily have to interact. But in the cities, the economic differences are more visible, and so more likely to incite violence, and hence the liberals give us the "degree of urbanization" hypothesis to explain Black violence. In the receding graph,  the US states and the District of Columbia are positioned according to their respective percentages of Blacks and mestizos in the resident population. It is rather easy to see that the Whitest states have the lowest rates for violent crime (murder, rape, armed robbery and aggravated assault were considered in making the graph). Somewhat higher rates of violence come with increasing percentages of mestizos, but the largest increase comes with increasing percentages of Blacks.
Anomalous points are probably the result of anomalous situations, but the trend is clear.

Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate racial
group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer distinguish
between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking Indians for the most
part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped together in one ethnic pot.

The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not in
the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal statistics for
mainstream and news organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are
not only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North
Africans, Iranians, Iraquis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees from
the former Soviet Union.

The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and
the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being white?"
The answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau, along
with mainstream media purposely distort criminal statistics and conveniently
classify Mexican-Americans as white because they do not want the American public to know the truth--that Blacks are responsible for committing the
vast majority of crimes here in the United States.

For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks,
who compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or a
whopping 58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8 per
100,000. Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed an estimated
2,242 murders in 1993. This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76 percent of the U.S. is
White (European-American) and they committed only 29.5 percent of the
murders. On the other hand, Black and Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21
percent of the population, yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the
murders in the U.S. during 1993.

This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as
likely to commit murder as a White person. Since this information is not deemed
"politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black segment of
society,
it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita basis for whites by backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic groups. Here are some more shocking statistics:
More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year.
Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by
Blacks in 1992.

In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were
committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.

Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder than Whites the same age.

Some 90% of the victims of race crimes are Whites.

Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites,
although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.

On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than
Whites.

Some 27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992
alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only
2% involved White offenders and Black victims.

1.3 million of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S.
each year are interracial.

Between 1964 and 1994, more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial murders in the U.S., compared to 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam
and 38,000 killed in Korea.

The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan, who
dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media. One wonders how many Whites have to be killed by Blacks before the N.Y. Times and Dan Rather break the conspiratorial silence about the number of White casualties in the guerrilla war being waged against them by Blacks.

Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.


Mr. Taylor reveals: 1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks. 3) 73% of all "justified self-defense" killings are committed by Blacks. 4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times. 5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.

In 1989, the FBI reported the following:

A) Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than Whites.
B) Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites.

C) Blacks commit 14 times more murders than Whites.

D) Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies.

E) Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than White
neighborhoods.

F) There were 629,000 interracial attacks committed in 1985 (the last
year
the FBI "chose" to report this information). Some nine out of every
ten were
committed by Blacks against Whites.

G. Black males (6% of the population) make up 46% of the nation's
prison
population.

Arrests by Race, 1993

The following statistics are contained within the Information Please
Almanac 1996, p. 853. The original source of this information is the
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports for
the United States, 1993, released Dec. 4, 1994.

These statistics once again indicate that Blacks are committing a grossly
disproportionate amount of the crimes. However, once again it should
be noted that the classification, "White," is very misleading because
even though Hispanics are not White and do not even consider themselves
White, the FBI has chosen to include their crimes among those committed by
Whites.

As a consequence, crimes by White people are substantially less than the
numbers would otherwise indicate. In fact, the statistics below indicate
that White European people actually commit far fewer crimes percentage-wise
than their percentage of the population.

I am the president of New Century Foundation, which Mr. Hutchinson
says is behind "a full-blown national campaign to alert whites to the danger of hate
crimes committed by blacks." In fact, we are interested in inter-racial crime
of all kinds, of which officially-classified "hate crimes" are an insignificant percentage.

Among the findings we have reported but that the media are deeply reluctant to publicize:

* Blacks commit 90 percent Of the approximately 1,700,000
interracial crimes of violence that occur in the United States every year,
and are more than 50 times more likely to commit violence against whites than
vice versa. In the case of robbery, or "mugging," blacks are more than 200
times more likely to attack whites than vice versa.

* There is actually more black-on-white than black-on-black violence. When
blacks commit violent crime they target whites just over half the time. When
whites commit violent crime, only two to three percent of their victims are
black.

* High rates of anti-white violence cannot be explained by arguing that
blacks are victimizing the people they think more likely to have money. Only
15 percent of black-on-white violent crimes are robberies, which have an
obvious monetary motive. The rest are simple and aggravated assaults, rapes,
and murders--few of which are likely to have a monetary motive.

* Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit what are officially classified as hate crimes. The "white" rate is actually inflated by a misleading classification system in which Hispanics are a victim category but not a perpetrator category. The same Mexican who is a "Hispanic" victim of a hate crime becomes "white" if he is a perpetrator.

* Blacks are as much more likely than whites to commit violent crime as men
are more likely than women--which, of course, is why there is racial profiling by the police (and by everyone else, for that matter).

These findings and many more are explained in meticulously documented detail
in our recent report, The Color of Crime. Ordering information is on our web
page, www.AmRen.com.

We think it is important to understand the extent and nature of inter-racial crime, not for the reasons Mr. Hutchinson attributes to us but because policy should be based on knowledge rather than ignorance.


Jared Taylor, President
New Century Foundation
Oakton, VA
703 716-0900
JarTaylor@aol.com





America's Victims - 12,000 Daily

American newspapers and TV endlessly run clips of the regrettable incident where four White policemen beat a Black.

To do this the media has to step over hundreds and thousands of bodies of White
men, women and children to find a flyspeck on an iceberg. Whites are virtually
ignored to concentrate on an incident in which a Black is a victim.

It is media policy to conceal the criminal's race. But, in spite of their "paper
curtain" - certain information still manages to slip through.

Truth At Last, #353, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta,
Georgia 30061 $15/yr, carried Pat
Buchanan's answer to the media's charge of White
"Hate crimes". They reported
Buchanan on May 7th as saying:

Blacks commit 8 times more assaults than do Whites
Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites
Blacks commit 14 times more murders
Blacks commit 19 times more armed robberies
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent
than White communities.
There were 629,000 interracial attacks
committed in 1985. Some 9 out of
every 10 attacks were committed by Blacks
against Whites.

[ED: The actual figure is many, many times this "official" figure. Most crime is
underreported and un-reported - unless it is violent or involves a great deal of
money. Rape is seldom reported because the media tries to print the victims
name - to discourage reporting. Vandalism and petty theft is so commonplace as
to not be newsworthy, and reporting seldom produce those guilty. The daily
beatings and robbery practiced against White children in the public schools
cannot be reported because there is no way to protect against retaliation.]
Blacks make up 12% of the population. Still, Blacks make up 46% of the nation's
prison population. Nearly 1/4 of all Negroes ages 20 to 29 are either in prison, on
probation or on parole, which compares to 10% for Hispanics and 6% for Whites.
Most interracial crime is overwhelmingly committed by Blacks against Whites.
These figures in themselves present a different picture from that the media would
have us believe, and, Buchanan merely touched on Hispanic crime while leaving
out Oriental and Indian crime entirely. If total "stranger-crime" were honestly
reported, we might be dumbfounded to discover that as much as 85%-90% of all
crime in the United States is committed by strangers, and much of it (if not most)
is committed against Whites.

About 250,000,000 people live in the U.S. Some 180 million are Westerners. A
one in ten victim rate produces 18 million crimes against them yearly. If strangers
commit only half, this is 9,000,000. If half of them are committed against Whites
it results in about 12,000 crimes committed against Whites by strangers each
and every day.

Once again, the California incident where the Black was beaten by White
policemen is regrettable, but, what about the more than 5 million Whites who
have fallen victim to strangers since that incident occurred? Don't any of the
rapes and cold blooded butcheries suffered by Whites merit the same careful
tear-jerk treatment?

"One category is interracial crimes. Its most recent publication (1997), "Criminal Victimization in the U.S.," reports on data collected in 1994. In that year, there were about 1,700,000 interracial crimes, of which 1,276,030 involved whites and blacks. In 90
percent of the cases, a white was the victim and a black was the perpetrator, while in 10 percent of the cases it was the reverse."

"Another finding of the NCVS report is that of the 2,025,464 violent crimes committed by blacks in 1994, 1,140,670 were against whites -- that's slightly over 56 percent. Whites committed 5,114,692 violent crimes; 135,360, or 2.6 percent were against blacks."

BLACKS AND CRIME: Blacks are 12.1% of the US population, while American Indians and Asians together are 3.5%. Thus, the FBI's "Whites" [Includes Mexicans, Arabs, Jews, etc.] are the remaining 84.4% of the population.. Blacks are 5.6 times as
likely to commit violent crimes as are "Whites." In other words, the average Black is 460% more likely to attack someone than the average "White" is. As compared to "Whites," Blacks are 4.5 times as likely to rape, 5.2 times as likely to commit aggravated
assault, and 10.3 times as likely to commit armed robbery. If you had read that Blacks were 30% more likely to be armed robbers than "Whites," you might not have been surprised. In fact, Blacks are 930% more likely to be armed robbers. The 12% of the US
population that is Black commits 58% of the armed robberies.

In 1996 law enforcement agencies reported to the FBI that they arrested 14,439 murderers. Of these murderers, 7,928 or 55% were Black. The murderer rate for Blacks is more than 26 per 100,000, while the "White" rate is less than 3 per 100,000. A Black
is 9 times as likely to murder as a "White" is. HISPANIC CRIME IS HIGH: Recall that we said that what the FBI calls
"Whites" is really a conglomeration of Whites, Hispanics, and others. For data on Hispanic crime, we can look at the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report, which lists the
actual data submitted by 10,000 law enforcement agencies before it is sanitized by the FBI. Five of the states-Arizona, California, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Texas-still keep track of Hispanic crime as a separate category. In one year in these five states, we find
under murderers: 1,156 Whites, 2,015 Hispanics, 1,526 Blacks, 134 Asians, and 54 Indians. Adjusted for population, Hispanics are 4.8 times as likely to murder as real Whites are, Blacks are 10 times as likely to murder, and Indians twice as likely as to murder.
Before we leave the subject of Hispanics, let us briefly mention what
the California Department of Justice reports about murder
and robbery. Of the 2,644 California murderers in 1995, 18% or 467
were White. California had 1,250 Hispanic murderers and 794
Black murderers. This data shows that in California, as compared to a
White, a Hispanic is 6.1 times as likely to murder, and a
Black is 13.2 times as likely to murder.

A California Hispanic is more than 5 times as likely to commit armed
robbery as a White, and a Black is nearly 20 times as likely
to be an armed robber as a White.

BLACK WOMEN AND MURDER: Removing Hispanics from the FBI's "White"
category exposes another interesting fact. In the five states keeping track of Hispanic crime, we found that Black women are actually 5% more likely to murder than White
men are. This is also true in almost all parts of the US where separate data is kept on Hispanics or where there are too few Hispanics to obscure the data. For example in seven Southern states, Black women are 15% more likely to murder than White
men are.

Since we said that in the South, Black women are 15% more likely to murder than White men are, to be fair we must compare White women to Black men. In these same seven Southern states, a Black man is 52 times more likely to murder than a White
woman is. Stated as a percentage, a Black man is 5200% more likely to
murder than a White woman is. OUTSIDE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE FBI DATA: Professor Levin [in his 1997 book, "Why Race Matters: Race Differences and What They Mean"] reviews some of the statistics on Black criminals that you may have heard. For example, a Black is 7.8 times as likely to be in prison as a "White." Over 30% of
the Black men between 23 and 29 are imprisoned for a felony. In major cities, it is worse. At any one time 42% of the Black males in Washington DC are in jail, on parole, on probation, or being sought by police. In Detroit, the number is somewhere between
45% and 50%. In Baltimore, it is 56%. Another study found that in one year, 25% of the Black men in Little Rock, Arkansas were arrested for a felony. Yet, another study shows that in the District of Columbia, 85% of the Black males will be arrested
at some point in their life.


INTERRACIAL CRIME: Perhaps the best place to look at interracial crime is in the South, because the media depicts the South's Whites as a bunch of violent gun-toting, Black-hating rednecks. In one year in seven Southern states, Blacks killed 226 Whites
while Whites killed only 66 Blacks. After adjusting the data for population size, it shows that a southern Black is 11.2 times as likely to murder as a southern White is. Table 2.8 of the FBI's 1996 Uniform Crime Report, lists interracial crime figures for the US as a whole. It shows that adjusted for population size, a Black is nearly 16 times as likely to murder a "White," than visa versa.

Here are some of the results cited in the university studies reviewed by Dr. Levin. Note that we don't know how each researcher defined White. One study shows that in the South, a Black is 10 times more likely to murder a White than visa-versa. A second
study demonstrates that proportionally, Blacks kill 22 times as many Whites as Whites kill Blacks. A third study shows that Blacks are about 11 times more likely to rape a White than a White is to rape a Black. He concludes that evidence exists to support the
stereotype that Black men lust after White women.

Professor Levin cites additional research showing that less than 3% of White crime is directed against Blacks, while one-half to two-thirds of the Black wave crime is directed against Whites. In yet another study, he found that the average Black is 25 times more likely to assault a White than the average White is likely to assault a Black.

CRIME

FACT #31: The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of Whites; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the past decade. (27) (6) (13)

FACT #32: According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole. (32) (6) (3)

FACT #33: Though only 12% of the U.S. population,
Blacks commit more than half of all rapes and
robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (32)
(27) (6)

FACT #34: Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime. (27)

FACT #35: A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than Vice Versa. (3) (32)

FACT #36: Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites choose Blacks. (2) (32) (28)

FACT #37: The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time. (3)

FACT #38: In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites. (32)

FACT #39: Many people argue that high Black incarceration rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes. However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as
Whites. (32) (6)

FACT #40: Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of  advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the
nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft. D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest
rate of incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80% Black. West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita. West Virginia is over 96% White. (33)



SOURCES

1.African Business Magazine, Dec. '91
2.American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg
822+
3.American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504,
Menlo Park, CA 94026
4.American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859
5.Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India,
Grove Press, New York, NY 1954
6.Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5.
1993
7."But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90
8."The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under
Attack!", Peter Hammond, Herald the Coming,
Dec. '92.
9.Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962,
Alfred A. Knopf
10.Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White
Nations Were Mongrelized - Then Negroized,
Sons of Liberty Books.
11.Fields, Dr. Ed, The Dangers of Interracial
Marriage, PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061
12.Howells, William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday,
Garden City, NY 1945.
13.Harris, Marvin, 1981. Why Nothing Works.
Simon & Schuster, New York, NY
14.Jacob, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ.
by author.
15.Jensen, Arthur R. Bias in Mental Testing, The
Free Press, New York 1980
16.Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental
Tests, the Free Press. (Macmillan) New York,
1981
17.McCall's, May '92, pg 76
18.McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race
Differences." U.S. News and World Report,
Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C.
19.Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966,
Noontide Press
20.Pearson, Roger. Race, Intelligence, and Bias in
Academe, Scott-Townsend Publishers, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
21.Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization,
Noontide Press.
22.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961,
Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL
23.Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search
for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76,
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
24.Putnam, Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities,
an address at the University of California at
Davis, Dec. 17, 1964
25.Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The U.S.
Experiment in School Integration,
Scott-Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989
26.Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro
Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York,
1966
27.Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western
Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535,
Washington, D. C. 20007
28.Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90
29."South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" Soldier of
Fortune, Dec. '89.
30.Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The
IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy.
Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
1990.
31.Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of
Education, U.S. District Court, Southern
Georgia, May 13, 1963.
32.Taylor, Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The
Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary
America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY
33.World Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92
34.United Nations World Census, 1990
35.Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's
Geography, Garden City Publ.
36.The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990.
37.Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization,
1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA
38.Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and
Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO
80535
39.Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and
Civilization, 1990, SFA
40.Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American
Achievement, Scott-Townsend, Washington,
D.C. 1989.
41.Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by
Des Griffin.




Inter-Racial Crime: The Dirty Little Secret
By John Perazzo

FrontpageMagazine.com | March 20, 2001

IN RESPONSE TO a white-on-black killing in Brooklyn a few years ago, an infuriated Al Sharpton instantly took to the airwaves and proclaimed that such attacks constituted "a national epidemic."

At the 1996 Million Man March, an impassioned Jesse Jackson thundered to his huge
black audience, "We're despised. . . . We're attacked for sport."

The Reverend Herbert Daughtry of New York asserts that white violence against blacks has rendered the latter "a hunted and endangered species."

Mary Frances Berry, who chairs the U.S. Civil Rights Commission,
attributes white-on-black violence to white people's persistent "belief in the
inferiority of blacks."

Ivy League professor and activist Cornel West calls African Americans our
country's "exemplary targets of racial hatred."

Given their outspokenness on the subject of interracial crime, it is indeed noteworthy that none of the aforementioned individuals -- nor any other prominent civil rights spokesman in the country, for that matter -- has had even a word to say about the recent Fat
Tuesday riot that erupted in Seattle. In the mayhem that occurred there, three-fourths of the rioters were black, and many of them deliberately targeted white victims for purely racial reasons. One witness, for instance, said she observed several incidents where groups of black men singled out and assaulted whites, in one case punctuating their
attack with shouts of "That's what you stupid white people get."

In the most notorious attack, a twenty-year-old white man named Kristopher Kime was clubbed in the back of the head as he tried to help an injured female victim who was lying on the road. The force of the blow to Kime's head sent him tumbling onto the pavement,
where he was kicked and stomped to death by several black men. Notwithstanding the brutal nature of this attack and others, we have heard not even a whisper of protest from our purported guardians of "civil rights."

We have heard them utter not even a syllable lamenting the tragic fact that innocent people were set upon for no reason other than their skin color. Presumably, these watchdogs of racism are all busy attending to matters more pressing. Sharpton, for one, is in Florida fighting to protect the civil rights of a black youngster who was recently sentenced to life-in-prison for the unspeakably barbaric murder and mutilation of a six-year-old girl. If the awful fate that befell Kristopher Kime were rare, perhaps the
subsequent silence of our self-anointed civil rights defenders could be excused. After all, rational people understand that busy social critics are under no obligation to publicly denounce every misguided, bigoted lunatic who happens to do something wicked. Yet such attacks are by no means rare, but in fact are alarmingly commonplace.

Each year, some 1.2 million violent crimes involving blacks and whites occur nationwide.

 In fully 90 percent of those cases, according to U.S. Justice Department
figures, the perpetrators are black and the victims are white.

Violent white felons choose black victims for fewer than 3 percent of their attacks,
whereas violent black felons choose white victims about 56 percent of the time. Statistically, the "average" African American is an astonishing 56 times more likely to attack a white than vice versa.

 

In one recent year, approximately 100 black women were raped by white men; the corresponding number of white women raped by black men was over 20,000, according
to Dinesh D'Souza in The End of Racism.

These numbers are staggering. If America were teeming with white racism, surely the perpetrators of interracial crime would be disproportionately white. Clearly, however, that is not at all the case. Though contemporary civil rights leaders strive to portray
white-on-black crime as commonplace, their rhetoric rings pathetically hollow. With tortured faces and ostensibly anguished hearts, they will seek out any microphone or news reporter willing to publicize their lamentations about even the rarest instances of
white racism in action. Meanwhile, they turn a deaf ear to the desperate screams of the thousands of white -- and black -- victims who fall prey to black
assailants each year.

Consequently unfortunate individuals like Kristopher Kime die in anonymity, their names fading from public memory as quickly as their graves are refilled with earth. Is it not time that the truth of interracial crime was finally, fearlessly told? Do not all Americans --
black and white alike -- have a right to be freed from the intellectual shackles of our country's quintessential frauds, commonly known as "civil rights crusaders"?

" There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime
" Of the approxiamtely 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence
involving blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks
against whites. Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to
do criminal violence to whites than the reverse.
" Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white
rate, and Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate.
" Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes
" Hispanics are a hate crime victim catefory but not a
perpetrator category. Hispanic offenders are classigied as whites,
which inflates the white offense rate and gives the impression that
Hispanics commit no hate crimes.
" Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more
dangerous than women.

From "The Color of Crime' available at:

New Century Foundation
2717 Clarkes Landing
Oakton, VA 22124
(703) 716-0900


or go to: http://www.amren.com/colrcrim.html





THE RACE WAR OF BLACK
AGAINST WHITE


Paul Sheehan

Racial Realities

Race And Crime In America

Have you ever noticed that the media rarely tells us about Black
crime, and if they do mention a crime that has occurred and the perpetrator was a Negro, they would not tell you or show you? But if a White commits a crime, especially against a Black, it is the top story for weeks.

Did you hear about the Negro car-jacker who, just a few months ago,
assaulted and pushed to the ground a White mother to steal her car? As he was driving away, the young mother tried to grab her child out of the back seat, but he got tangled in the seat belts half way out the door. The Negro took off, dragging the
poor child bouncing on the pavement while the mother was screaming for the car-jacker to stop. He didn't. Five miles later, White motorists forced the Negro off the
road-the child was shredded and dead. Perhaps you heard about that incident just once-maybe not at all.

Of course, if that had been a White man who was the carjacker and killed a Negro child in the same way it would have been the major headlines day after day for months. It's
a highly controlled media game to manipulate your thinking to believe there is no real difference between races or any racial connection with crime. They do this by ignoring real Black crime and focusing on the Whites to make it look like the Whites are the bad guys.

A study was done in 1983 that showed that on prime time T.V. only about 10% portrayed as criminals were Black (Rocher, L. and Lickster, R. Prime Time Crime. Washington
D.C.: The Media Initiative.)

The truth is, the media is portraying a lie to you. Here are the facts they do not want you to know. The F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports in the 1990s demonstrate that Negroes
commit 1,200% or 12 times the per capita robbery rate of White and 900% or 9 times the per capita murder rate. Interestingly, the "White" group analyzed included non-White Mexicans, Puerto Ricans and other Hispanic people. So, if only Caucasian folks and their crime was compared with Blacks, the difference would be even greater.


Put another way, Blacks who make up only 12.1% of the population in America commit 55% of the murder, whereas Whites (including Mexicans, et. al.) commit 43%. 
The murder rate for Blacks is 44.9 per 100,000. For Whites (including non-White elements), the rate is 4.78 per 100,000.

Blacks commit 9 times more rapes than Whites, 8 times more assaults and 19 times more armed robberies, according to Pat Buchanan.

Jared Taylor in his book Paved With Good Intentions reveals that 60% of people killed by police are Blacks, 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks and 64%
of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.

What about Black on White crime? The lying media would have us believe that Whites hate Blacks and commit more crimes against Blacks. Again, the F.B.I. Uniform Crime
Reports for 1993:

* Blacks are 2,200% (22 times) more likely to kill Whites than Whites kill Blacks.

* Blacks victimized Whites in armed robbery 167,924 times versus 7,031 times for Whites against Blacks.

As far as rapes go, in 1991 there were only 100 rapes of Black females
by White men but 20,204 White women were raped by Black males (U.S. Department of Justice, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1991 (1992), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office).

Why is there grossly disproportionate crime statistics between Blacks and Whites? Is it poverty that causes crime? If that is true, then one would expect Black crime to go
down as their standard of living raises. However, since the civil rights push in the 1960s with affirmative action, etc., Black crime has gone up.

Distorted Statistics

Prior to 1986, Hispanics were classified as a distinct and separate racial group. Not anymore. The FBI and U.S. Census Bureau no longer distinguish between Hispanics (who are actually Spanish speaking Indians for the most part) and Whites; their crimes are lumped together in one ethnic pot.

The 22,354,059 Hispanics living in the U.S. do not exist, at least not in the ethnic sense when it comes to the FBI compiling criminal statistics for mainstream and news organizations. Included by the FBI as "WHITES" are not only Hispanics, but also West Asians, Jews, Middle Easterners, North Africans, Iranians, Iraquis, Libyans, Palestinians, and Jewish refugees from the former Soviet Union.


The question that immediately comes to mind is: "Why would the FBI and
the U.S. Census Bureau classify persons of Hispanic origin as being white?"
The answer might surprise you. The FBI and the U.S. Census Bureau, along
with mainstream media purposely distort criminal statistics and conveniently
classify Mexican-Americans as white because they do not want the American
public to know the truth--that Blacks are responsible for committing the
vast majority of crimes here in the United States.

For example, in 1993, there were 20,343 Americans murdered: Blacks, who compromise 12 percent of the U.S. population, committed 11,686 or a whopping 58 percent of those murders. The black murder rate was 38.8 per 100,000.
Based on their murder rate in 1986, Hispanics committed an estimated 2,242 murders in 1993.

This is 10.7 per 100,000. 76 percent of the U.S. is White (European-American) and they committed only 29.5 percent of the murders. On the other hand, Black and Hispanic minorities combined constitute 21 percent of the population, yet they committed a staggering 68.7 percent of the murders in the U.S. during 1993.

This means, on a per capita basis, a Black person is 12.3 times as likely to commit murder as a White person. Since this information is not deemed "politically correct" and would perhaps offend the black segment of society,it is offset by falsely inflating the per capita basis for whites by backhandedly including Hispanics and other ethnic groups.

Here's the facts on interracial rape:

Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race
Relations in Contemporary America (New York: Carrol & Graf,
1992), 92-93:

"When whites do violence - rape, murder, assault - how often do they choose black victims? Shouldn't a nation of bigots target blacks most of the time? At least half of the time? Of course, it does not. When whites commit violence, they do it to blacks 2.4
percent of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose white victims more than half the time. (n.317)
In those cases in which the race of the killer is known, blacks kill twice as many whites as whites kill blacks. Black-on-white robberies and gang assaults are twenty-one times more common than white on black. In the case of gang robbery, blacks victimize whites fifty-two times more often than whites do blacks. (n318)

The contrasts are even more stark in the case of interracial rape. Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black.

 

Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape. (n.319) 


Because interracial rape is now overwhelmingly black on white, it has become difficult to do research on it or to find relevant statistics. The FBI keeps very detailed national records on crime, but the way it presents rape data obscures the racial element rather than clarifies it.

Dr. William Wilbanks, a criminologist at Florida International University, had to sift carefully through the data to find that in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. (n.320) Another researcher oncludes that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as often as white men raped black women.(n.321)
Interracial crime figures are even worse than they sound. Since there are more than six times as many whites as blacks in America, it means that any given black person is vastly more likely to commit a crime against a white than vice versa."

Notes
n. 317. "What Should Be Done," US News & World Report (August
22, 1989), p. 54. See also Department of Justice, Criminal
Victimization in the United States, 1987 (Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1989), p.7.
n. 318. Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the
United States , 1987.
n. 319. Gary D. LaFree, "Male Power and Female Victimization:
Toward a Theory of Interracial Rape," American Journal of
Sociology , Vol. 88, No. 2 (September 1982).
n. 320. William Wilbanks, "Frequency and Nature of Interracial
Crimes," submitted for publication to the Justice Professional
(November 7, 1990). Data derived from Department of Justice,
Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1987 , p. 53.
n. 321. Andrew Hacker, Two Nations , pp. 183, 185.




The annual Department of Justice Victimization Surveys report that in nine cases out of ten interracial violent crime is perpetrated by blacks on whites.

Figures for 1996 show that on a per capita basis, blacks are three times as likely as
whites to commit crimes driven by racial prejudice.

1999 Total White Black
Violent crime 419,473 248,120 162,264

1999
White population 224,611,000
Black population 34,862,000

Rate of white arrests for violent crimes to white population per
100,000
248,120 / 224,611,000 x 100,000 = 110

Rate of black arrests for violent crimes to black population per
100,000
162,264 / 34,862,000 x 100,000 = 465

Black arrest for violent crimes are 4 times the white arrests.

http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t410.pdf
http://www.census.gov/population/es.../intfile3-1.txt

Black defendants were the most likely to have a criminal history. Seventy percent of black defendants compared to 60% of whites and 35% of Hispanics had previously been convicted. Additionally, black defendants had more extensive criminal histories than whites or Hispanics. Of those defendants with a prior conviction, 34% of blacks had been convicted 5 or more times compared to 26.4% of whites and 14.2% of Hispanics.

About 40% of those incarcerated during 1997 were black; 33% Hispanic; 24%, white; and 3%, other racial or ethnic groups. Hispanic inmates were among those most likely to report being involved with opiates, cocaine powder, and  marijuana. Black inmates most often reported being involved with cocaine powder and crack cocaine; white inmates, methanphetamine and marijuana.

----------------------------------------
The Bureau of Justice Statistics is the statistical agency in the U.S. Department
of Justice. Lawrence A. Greenfeld is acting director.

BJS Special Reports address a specific topic in depth from one or more data sets
that cover many topics.

John Scalia wrote this report. Urban Institute staff, under the supervision of Laura Winterfield, and Matthew Hickman of BJS, provided statistical review. Tina Dorsey produced and edited the report. Jayne Robinson prepared the report for final publication.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/fdo99.txt

====================================
Charles Reese, writing in the Florida Sentinel, tells us

Whilst 100 rapes were carried out by whites on blacks, blacks carried out 20,202 rapes on whites.

Against the 7,031 robberies which involved a white perpetrator and a black victim, we
have to balance the 167,924 robberies where the roles were reversed.

The number of assaults by whites on blacks was 49,800, but black on white assaults
were a massive 431,670.

In the category of all violent crime, 55,301 involved white perpetrators and a black
victim, whilst the reverse situation was an unbelievable 572, 458.

WHILE OUTNUMBERED BY ALMOST 9 TO 1

Charles Reese, writing in the Florida Sentinel, tells us In the category of all violent crime, 55,301 involved white (and hispanic) perpetrators and a black victim, whilst the reverse situation was an unbelievable 572, 458.

White and hispanic violent crimes against negros = 55,301

negro violent crimes against Whites = 572,458

populations:

negros 12%
Whites 70%


It doesn't get any more obvious than this.


Getting down to the facts...

The facts about interracial crime, of which "hate" crime is an insignificant subset, are at once known, skewed and hidden.

The main fact you need to know is that there are under 10,000 so-called hate crimes a year, less than half of which are violent. But there are 1.7 million interracial crimes each year -- more than ninety percent of which are black on White.

The only reason we are discussing such a tiny subset of crimes is that Jews, who control the media and can make their lies stick, find it politically useful. Their agitprop artists created the very category and concept of hate crimes; their TV stations broadcast the
brainwashing until it sinks in; and their lobbyists will pester the Congress until the mere existence of White males is criminalized. Jews are like that. To them, Whites and White males are by their very nature and existence hate criminals.

As Jewess Susan Sontag said, speaking for all Jews, "The White race is the cancer of human history." Jews truly believe this. They are our enemy. We Whites are just too naive and gullible and decent and unassuming to realize it.

As I write, black savages have gone on White-attacking sprees at Mardi Gras celebrations in Philadelphia and Seattle. Both have been covered up by the Jewish media, which consistently point the finger away from the black man when apportioning blame.
Drunken revelers, weak cops, The Beast -- anything will be blamed except black criminals.
Were it not for Jewish-inspired "civil rights" laws, niggers who punched blonde White girls in the head would be cowering in their ghettos afraid of being lynched. Now these savages are out among us, terrorizing us, and we are afraid to fight back out of our cowardice and fear of committing a hate crime by defending ourselves.

Such is the world Hymie has led us to.

And if the criminals aren't blacks, they are Asians or Mexicans -- street scum that wouldn't be here if the Jew hadn't destroyed our racial homogeneity through the
1965 Immigration Act. Before that act, America was 90% white, and civilized. After that act, America is barely seventy percent white, and the number is dropping rapidly. Before that act, there were more Americans of Swiss ancestry than Mexican. Today one in ten -- nine? -- Americans is a Mexican.

All this disintegration, this crime, this misery, can be laid at the feet of the Jew. He encouraged The Act knowing full well the results, and he glories in what he has achieved: the destruction of cohesive, civilized WHITE America. Shows like MTV's Hate Whitey Day are one of myriad ways he pulls the wool over your eyes, White man, while laughing in your face. He doesn't think you have the guts or brains to call him on it. And don't expect any help from the conservatives. The conservatives are Christian cowards, constrained by their paychecks to toe the Semites' line. White nationalism is where we must turn to find the only genuine opposition to the Jew controlling our schools, media and government....

Now back to the crime data.

The data come from the corrupt Department of Justice, whose FBI collects statistical information from counties all over the United States. Before digging into it directly, let's just observe that the data show that interracial crime is hugely and disproportionately committed by minorities, and that these same go out of their way to attack White victims.

For example, a White man is fifty-six times as likely to be attacked by a black man as the reverse.

Fifty-six times.

That is what FBI data forwarded from the counties show. And rest assured, the actual picture is even worse, because the FBI discriminates -- commits a hate crime in the same way MTV does – in categorizing the data.

The FBI years ago eliminated the Hispanic offender category. So that crimes committed by the brown invaders are lumped into the White perpetrator file. That's right: the  government that takes your tax money at gunpoint makes sure that you and your fellow Whites receive full credit for violent "hate" crimes committed by Hispanics.

Whites are blamed for crimes that Mexicans commit, by federal decree.

Are we living under a hate government? Is the FBI a hate group? It would appear so....

In the ultimate absurdity, if a brown commits a hate crime against a White, the statistics reflect it as a White-on-White hate crime. There are hundreds of these White-on-White cases annually.

Let's cut to the chase with an easy-reference guide to interracial crime, data taken from The Color of Crime, a special report prepared by Jared Taylor's outfit, American Renaissance:

* 1,700,000 interracial crimes are committed each year

* 90% of interracial crimes are black on White

* blacks commit interracial crime at 56x the rate of
Whites: 10 per 100k vs 560 per 100k

* 94% of multiple-offender interracial crimes were black on
White -- nig packs

* about 500,000 of these in average year

* robbery was motive in less than 1/3 (nigs beat Whites for
fun)

* 1990 Hate Crimes Statistics Act compels FBI to collect
data on acts motivated in whole or part by
bias.

* Most counties (83%) supply info, although not legally
required to

* 1997 report showed under 10,000 "hate" crimes

* 7,000 were ethnic/racial bias

* less than half were violent (graffiti, cross burnings,
etc.)

* blacks are twice as likely to commit a hate crime as
Whites

* blacks are 2.2x as likely to commit a violent hate crime
as whites

* blacks are 38x likelier to rape White women than Whites
are to rape blacks

* 30,000 White women were raped by negros (1994)

* 5,400 blacks were raped by Whites (how many of these
Whites were Mexicans?)

* 56% of black violent crime is committed against Whites

* 2.6% of White violent crime is against blacks

After reviewing these data, ask yourself who are the real haters: The Whites who suffer from Negro depredations? Or the negros who have laws and admissions
and employment policies twisted in their favor? The answer is neither. The Negro is just doing what comes naturally, proving Jefferson's words about the "indelible lines of distinction" nature has drawn between jungle blacks and civilized Whites, and bearing out his truth that the "two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government." No, the real hater is neither race. The real hater is the Jew who bans these facts from the television and public sheets, confines them to corners of the Internet --and even there works night and day to get them filtered, censored, banned and ultimately criminalized. The MTV Jew who replaces the truth with his lies is the hater. The Jew is your enemy, White man. As is MTV, which is owned and run by Jews.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index57.htm

"In its last complete National Criminal Victimization Survey (1994),the Justice Department revealed blacks to have committed 1,600,951 violent crimes against whites. Only 15 percent of these had robbery as a motive. We can safely infer that most of the rest had race as at least a partial motive. Eighty-five percent of the attacks were assaults and rapes. While blacks were committing these 1.6 million crimes against whites, whites were reciprocating with 165,345 violent offenses against blacks. Blacks, representing thirteen percent of the nation, committed more than 90 percent of the violent inter-racial crime.
Fifty-seven percent of the violent crime committed by blacks had white victims. Less than 3 percent of violence committed by whites had black victims. In 1994, a black was 64 times more likely to attack a white than vice versa. This is the real story of hate in America. It is the media's well-kept secret."

http://www.ety.com/HRP/hatecrime/blackwhite.htm

That blacks have higher crime rates
because of:

higher sexuality
Lower intelligence
Higher aggression
Lower levels of parental care
Inferior personality traits such as self
esteem, impulsiveness


Walter E. Williams is a professor at George Mason University at
Fairfax, Va:

Experts love to blame crime on poverty. That's nonsense! From 1900 to 1929, the nation's murder rate rose from 1.2 per 1 00,000 of the population to 8.4. However, during parts of the 1930s, when the unemployment rate stood at 37 percent, the murder rate had fallen to 6.3 per 100,000 and to 4.7 per 100,000 by 1960. After 1960, violent crime rates shot up. By 1993, the murder rate was 9.5 per 100,000, falling to 8.2 in 1995. Rather than poverty causing crime, one might more easily make the case that crime causes poverty.

http://www.manhattan-institute.org/...nchdn-voice.htm
AS OF 06/02